Bengihlala ngicabanga ngakho, bekuhlala kunginika umuzwa, kepha angikaze ngicabangisise ngakho: ukwakheka kwemikhiqizo emisha ye-Apple, ikakhulukazi iMac Pro, kungikhumbuze okuningi okwakudala Braun. Kwakuhlala kuyinto engazi lutho, kuze kube yizinsuku ezedlule ngaqala uphenyo oluncane ukusekela noma ukulahla lo mbono.
Futhi akukho lutho ngaphandle kwe-googled okwakwanele kimi ukuqinisekisa, kancane kancane, izinsolo. Futhi uphenyo lwaphela ngoba othile wayesevele ebhalile ngakho: eGizmodo bashicilela i-athikili enhle kakhulu lapho behlaziya khona kahle lo mkhuba, nezithombe ezikhuluma njengalesi esingenhla ngazo.
Iphuzu ukuthi ithonya le- Izinqama zokudla (Umklami weBraun kuma-50's naku-60's) kumqondisi womklamo weCupertino, UJonathan Ive, likhulu. URams wayengomunye wabamele abaluleke kakhulu be-Gute Form movement, eyaqhubeka nomqondo wokuqanjwa kwama-rationalist owakhuthazwa yiBauhaus kanye ne-Ulm School, umqondo jikelele ongafingqwa emithethweni ethi "less is more" futhi " form kulandela umsebenzi ".
Ngabe kufanele siqonde ukuthi i-Apple ngokuyisisekelo ikopela imikhiqizo ye-Braun, ngaphandle kokuqamba ngempela? Kunzima ukuphendula lowo mbuzo, kepha akungabazeki ukuthi i-apula likweleta okuningi kumklamo kaBraun.
Kepha kukhona elinye iphuzu. Kwenzeka kanjani ukuthi i-Apple, inkampani ye-avant-garde, isekele ukwakheka kwayo emibonweni yenhlangano eyaqala ukwenqatshwa okuningi kusukela ngawo-80s, lapho kwase kucatshangelwa ukuthi izinto ezakhiwe ngomqondo owodwa wokusebenza zazikhona kuyisicefe nokuthi izinto akufanele zisebenze kuphela, kepha futhi kufanele futhi zenze isibopho esihambisanayo nomsebenzisi? Kwenzeka kanjani ukuthi izinto ze-Apple zisuselwe emibonweni yokusebenza kodwa zibe zidala ukulutha okungaka?
Ngicabanga ukuthi impendulo iyindida, okuphikisayo ukuthi akuyona indida: ukhiye usesimweni esihle, okuyilokho okushiwo yigute ekugcineni.
I-athikili ku-Gizmodo | Imikhiqizo yama-Braun yama-1960 ibambe izimfihlo zekusasa lika-Apple